TUNA 2026-2

MAGURO 2026-2

 


Special Editorial / Perspective

THREE DECKS, ONE FISH
Three fishing positions for one bluefin tuna

Even when holding a rod for the same fish, the view from the deck differs completely depending on whether you're in Japan, North America, or Europe. We investigated the current reality of recreational bluefin tuna fishing.

Hello.
For those of us chasing bluefin tuna in the Genkai Sea or Hokkaido, it's impossible to avoid discussions about "rules" and "regulations." Bluefin tuna is the "ultimate target" that anglers want to face head-on someday. However, this fish has now become not only an object of fishing for anglers worldwide but also a complex "object to contend with regulations."

This time, I'd like to consider it from a slightly different perspective. Japan, North America, and Europe (UK). What are the anglers in these three regions actually dealing with when they cast their lines? What emerged was not merely a "difference in regulatory strictness," but a deeper, more fundamental difference in "how we anglers are treated" within the management system.

///

JAPAN: Rules suddenly descended upon a once-free sea.

When discussing recreational bluefin tuna fishing in Japan, the first fact to acknowledge is that "there were virtually no regulations until very recently." For both charter boats and pleasure boats, restrictions were effectively zero. Many anglers routinely fished for schools of tuna in areas like off Sado Island and the Sea of Japan.

However, in June 2021, rules suddenly appeared in these waters in the form of a directive from the wide-area fisheries coordination committee. Currently, the main rules from an angler's perspective are as follows:

Current Main Rules in Japan

  • Catching bluefin tuna under 30kg (including shibi, yokowa, and meji) is prohibited. If caught, they must be released immediately.
  • During prohibited periods, intentional catch-and-release is itself forbidden. Only accidental catches while targeting other species (e.g., catching bluefin tuna while targeting yellowfin tuna) are allowed to be immediately released.
  • Keeping large fish (over 30kg) is strictly limited. Bag limits are set for each period.
  • Reporting obligation. Weight, fork length, area, and landing location must be reported via smartphone or LINE with photographic evidence.
  • Registration system from 2024. A system of approval and registration for recreational bluefin tuna fishing has started for charter boat operators, gradually strengthening the management framework.

Thanks to this system, bluefin tuna resources have dramatically recovered. As of 2026, just five years since the system's implementation, monster tuna migrations have been observed in various locations. Monster tuna, previously unimaginable in areas other than Aomori, are now approaching the coast. All of us anglers are witnesses to this.

Our true feelings are encapsulated in this one statement from the beginning of the system: "At the very least, we wish catch-and-release fishing were allowed." While we understand the rationale for resource conservation, there's a lingering feeling that the enjoyment of fishing itself has been denied.

The essential problem here is not the severity of the penalties. Japan's Fisheries Act has a weak framework for positioning "recreational fishing" in the sea, and from the outset, we anglers had no basis to sit at the table for system design as stakeholders. Therefore, rules are determined, in a sense, unilaterally from above as "notifications" rather than "discussions." The cost of having a culture as "harvesters" but no system as "protectors" is rapidly becoming apparent in Japan. Even those who introduced the system have been experimenting for five years. However, they must be feeling positive about the significant result of resource recovery, right?

///

NORTH AMERICA — A Sea of Permitting Systems from Birth

Crossing the Atlantic to America, the premise of fishing spots changes fundamentally. In the US, if you're targeting bluefin tuna, an HMS (Highly Migratory Species) permit from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) is mandatory for the boat. There's no option for a permit for shore fishing, and violating this can result in a $2,000 fine even for a first offense.

However, in return, the rules are surprisingly specific and deeply ingrained in the fishing community.

Specific Rules in America

  • Keep size is approximately 69-185cm fork length. Large fish over 185cm fall into the "trophy" category, limited to one per boat per year.
  • Bag limits are calculated "per boat, per day." The culture is to count per boat, not per angler.
  • Report kept/dead individuals within 24 hours.
  • Tag-and-release/catch-and-release is institutionalized. The premise for release is that the fish is not taken out of the water. Released individuals are also tagged, providing data for verification.

Here, anglers are not "objects" of management but "counted members" of it. They have their share under the name of the recreational quota, a clear reward of one trophy fish, and contribute to stock assessment through reporting and tagging. Commercial and recreational fishing are placed within the same framework, and anglers seem to be integrated as part of the numbers from the start!

///

EUROPE / UK — Anglers who raised their voices, saying "Let us fish"

The most dramatic case is the UK. Originally, targeting bluefin tuna in UK waters was illegal. However, from around 2015, large numbers of bluefin tuna began returning to the nearshore waters in autumn. Anglers were in a situation where monster tuna were right in front of them, but they couldn't cast a line. It wasn't the administration that acted, but surprisingly, the anglers themselves.

A handful of anglers involved politicians and scientists to design legal sport fisheries. In 2021, a research program called "CHART (Catch & Release Tagging)" was launched, creating a system where anglers don't "harvest" but "catch, measure, tag, and release" to scientifically verify data.

Reddit and UK angling organizations finally took action, and the UK moved towards full liberalization of recreational fishing specifically for catch-and-release (C.R.R.F.). * Catch & Release Recreational Fishing

Cutting-edge Rules in the UK

  • Strictly catch-and-release. Landing, transporting, or taking fish out of the water is strictly prohibited.
  • Introduction of a permit system. Permits are issued per vessel.
  • All trips must be reported within 24 hours. Even if you catch nothing (a "bozu"), reporting is mandatory!
  • Code of Conduct and training. Minimizing fight time, sufficient in-water resuscitation, etc., with fish welfare (survival rate) as the top priority.

What is noteworthy here is that angler organizations are at the table for policy design alongside the government. Anglers are not "the regulated" but "the creators of the fishery," and co-operators in ecosystem conservation through data. Isn't the UK an example we should emulate?

///

THREE SEATS, COMPARED — Same Rod, Different Chair

There's no point in competing over who has the strictest rules. My research shows that no sea is lenient. What differs is the "type of chair" one sits in.
Japanese anglers are made to sit in the "managed chair," North American anglers sit in the "counted chair," and UK anglers sit in a "self-created chair." Even if you catch the same bluefin tuna, the meaning of that single fish within the system is completely different.

Perspective on Fishing Spot JAPAN NORTH AMERICA (US) EUROPE (UK)
Starting point Unrestricted → Sudden regulation Permit system from the start Illegal → Liberalized by anglers
Angler's position "Object" of management Counted member "Co-operator" of the system
C&R (Catch and Release) Targeted catch-and-release prohibited during certain periods Tag-and-release institutionalized Full C&R + data via tagging
Reporting obligation For kept fish / Photo attachment Within 24 hours (for kept/dead fish) All trips (even if no catch)
Angler organization involvement Still limited organizational presence Integrated into quota allocation Stakeholders negotiating with government
///

THE PATH FOR JAPANESE ANGLERS — Future Course from the Fishing Deck

The dramatic recovery of bluefin tuna in just five years should be joyful news for us anglers. The fact that it's often discussed in tandem with the gloom of "regulations becoming stricter in inverse proportion to resource recovery" is precisely because anglers have consistently been kept outside the conversation about management. From the perspective of the fishing deck, the path forward, which should be discussed carefully, is:

1. From "Object" to "Co-Operator"

If anglers sit at the table as stakeholders, regulations transform from "notifications" to "agreements." The creation of a framework where major fishing tackle manufacturers, angler organizations, charter boat operators, scientists, and the administration design together is needed above all else.

2. Don't fight Catch & Release, transform it into science

The current situation where "even targeted catch-and-release is prohibited" is difficult for anglers to accept. Like the UK's CHART program, if release is incorporated into the system as an "act that generates data," anglers can become contributors to resource recovery.

3. From "Surveillance" to "Participation" in Reporting

Japan's reporting system, which allows submissions via smartphone or LINE, feels technically advanced. The next step is whether we can share the narrative that it's not for enforcement, but for protecting our own fishing grounds.

4. Cultivate a "Culture of Release" by Ourselves

Before someone else takes it away, we anglers ourselves should nurture a culture of stewardship—this accumulation will ultimately protect the freedom of our cherished fishing grounds. While the discussion is currently framed around tuna, isn't it time to advance discussions about all marine resources and recreational fishing? Perhaps the issue of black bass in Lake Biwa might be the clearest example.

bluefin tuna catch and release
Release scene in the Genkai Sea. Connecting life to the future ocean.

In this sea where bluefin tuna have returned, what will be tested next may not be the number of fish, but our "maturity as anglers." The view from the boat deck is also a reflection of the system. If the day comes when Japanese tuna anglers proactively sit in "self-created chairs," then the news of recovery will finally be something we can celebrate wholeheartedly. Amberjack will continue to cast lines in the field and hopes to think with you about the future of the ocean.

2026 AMBERJACK NEVER STOP THINKING The Amberjack Journal